Mailshine » Blog

What is the global cost of spam?

admin — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:39:04 +0000

Fastcompany.com is reporting that 107 trillion emails were sent in 2010 and that 89% were spam. Both of these figures are staggering. But it got us thinking. Can we estimate the global productivity cost of spam?

While only a fraction of the spam sent gets to an inbox, what does get through can quickly consume a lot of time. One phishing spam message alone can result in a costly security breach, involving numerous and well-paid IT and security personnel to clean up the mess. Then there is the productivity cost of employees sifting through in-boxes full of spam to try to find the messages they need to take action on. What about the costs of dealing with legitimate messages that get blocked by misconfigured or overly zealous spam filters? (ie. false positive)

So, let’s estimate that half a second is the average time spent by the recipient per spam message sent. Next, let’s estimate the average wage of the recipient is $10 per hour. From this we should be able to come up with the approximate global productivity cost of spam in 2010.

Number of Emails sent: 107 trillion
Number of Spam messages sent: 95 trillion
Time spent processing spam: 13.2 billion hours
Productivity cost of spam: $132 billion dollars

As a leader at your company, what are you doing to prevent spam from eroding your productivity and stealing your company’s profits?

$2.6m judgment in CAN-SPAM lawsuit

admin — Wed, 12 May 2010 07:00:44 +0000

The Register is reporting a $2.6 million judgment has been awarded to Asis Internet Services, a small California based ISP. Asis customers were the recipients of just under 25,000 spam messages in an 18 month period from a company called Find a Quote.

The original judgment of $865,340 was tripled when it was determined by the judge that the defendant had utilized automated scripts to send the spam.

See the full story here.

Exports of Spam from China are down

admin — Tue, 11 May 2010 04:03:15 +0000

Many of the things we use in our daily lives are manufactured in China. However, according IndiaServer.com, China has dropped from the number 2 global producer of spam in 2006 and now holds the number 15 place.

A primary reason given for the decline is increased government regulation for Chinese email services that went into effect in March 2010.

E-mail service providers are required to register the IP (Internet Protocol) addresses of their e-mail servers with the authorities. They have also taken other measures like keeping logs of e-mail traffic, including the IP addresses of all e-mail senders and recipients, for two months.

Service providers that violate the new regulations are fined up to 30,000 yuan ($3,729).

Anti-Spam Researchers” Fight Botnet With Botnet

admin — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:25:46 +0000

Researchers at the International Computer Science Institute in Berkley, California, and the University of California, San Diego have developed an “effectively perfect” method for blocking SPAM sent via Botnets.

Botnets are large networks of compromised computers which run malicious software in the background, pumping out thousands of SPAM messages unbeknown to the owners.

“The system works by exploiting a trick that spammers use to defeat email filters. As spam is churned out, subtle changes are typically incorporated into the messages to confound spam filters. Each message is generated from a template that specifies the message content and how it should be varied. The team reasoned that analysing such messages could reveal the template that created them. And since the spam template describes the entire range of the emails a bot will send, possessing it might provide a watertight method of blocking spam from that bot.”

To test their strategy, the team installed a previously catpured botnet onto a machine in their posession. They monitored outbound traffic and analyzed approimately 1000 spam messages—less than 10 minutes’ work for most bots—then reverse engineered the template.

“Knowledge of that template then enabled filters to block further spam from that bot with 100 per cent accuracy.”

Read the full article from NewsScientist

“Godfather of Spam” goes to prison for four years

ryan — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:40:21 +0000

It’s always good news when we see spam levels on our mail filtering service drop. Though our clients rarely notice increases or decreases in spam levels due the technologies Mailshine uses to filter mail, we definitely see it on our end. Often these drops or spikes in mail traffic correlate directly with events in the media pertaining to another spamming organization that has been shut down. Unfortunately, it seems that as soon as one shuts down, another starts up.

Yesterday Alan Ralsky, often referred to as the “Godfather of Spam”, was sentenced to 4-years in a federal prison. Ralsky’s operation pulled in millions of dollars through “pump and dump” schemes of thinly traded stocks in companies you’ve never heard of. Millions of emails would be sent out in an automated fashion via botnets created and run by Ralsky’s staff touting IPOs worth buying into. These stocks often were trading for mere pennies and—amazingly—some would want in on the action. Stock prices would jump at which time the shares would be dumped.

Just how lucrative is this? According to the government’s court documents, here are list of payments documented from one month, July 2005:

July 5: $180,826.61
July 11: $211,595.76
July 14: $13,532
July 22: $780,295.98
July 26: $65,590.71
July 27: $424,963.73
July 27: $23,702

Ralsky and company earned more than $2.6 million between May 1 and December 1, 2005 alone.

Read the full story here: Arstechnica

Mailshine 2.0

ryan — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:02:39 +0000

In our constant effort to improve the mailshine customer experience, we’re proud to announce Mailshine 2.0. This new site features a more intuitive layout and a few new features which we hope will improve your ability to find the information you need, when you need it. Most notably, we’ve added an online chat feature allowing you to ask quick questions with quick responses.

~Mailshine

What would happen if you answered ALL of your SPAM email?

admin — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:37:00 +0000

With the help of 50 volunteers worldwide, McAfee recently conducted an experiment to determine what the result of responding to each and every spam message would be. Though it’s pretty easy to guess the outcome, some of the results were quite interesting. Here is a breakdown:

Males receive 15 more spam messages per day than females.
Clicking “unsubscribe” provide useless in most cases, and often resulted in increased levels of spam
Providing mailing addresses when attempting to receive free brochures, eyeliner, or an iPod resulted in incredible amounts of junk-mail at the doorstep.
18% of all spam received by US volunteers came in the form of phishing attempts (bank scams, Nigerian scams, etc).
US participants received 65% more spam than participants from any other country.
In almost all cases, the most notable side-effect was PC slowdowns thanks to spyware, malware and so on.

Read the full article here.